F.I.F.A. – Commissione per lo Status dei Calciatori (2015-2016) – debiti scaduti – ———- F.I.F.A. – Players’ Status Committee (2015-2016) – overdue payables – official version by www.fifa.com – Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee passed on 12 October 2015 by Mr Sunil Gulati (USA) Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee, on the claim presented by the club, Club A, Country B as Claimant against the club, Club C, Country D as Respondent regarding a contractual dispute between the parties in connection with overdue payables

F.I.F.A. - Commissione per lo Status dei Calciatori (2015-2016) – debiti scaduti – ---------- F.I.F.A. - Players’ Status Committee (2015-2016) – overdue payables – official version by www.fifa.com – Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee passed on 12 October 2015 by Mr Sunil Gulati (USA) Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee, on the claim presented by the club, Club A, Country B as Claimant against the club, Club C, Country D as Respondent regarding a contractual dispute between the parties in connection with overdue payables I. Facts of the case 1. On 1 July 2013, the Club of Country B, Club A (hereinafter: Claimant), and the Club of Country D, Club C (hereinafter: Respondent), signed a loan agreement regarding the loan of the Player E (hereinafter: player), from the Claimant to the Respondent. 2. In accordance with the loan agreement, the Respondent undertook to pay to the Claimant the total amount of EUR 320,000, payable in eight equal instalments of EUR 40,000 on 15 July 2013, 1 October 2013, 1 January 2014, 1 April 2014, 1 July 2014, 1 October 2014, 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2015. 3. By correspondence dated 14 August 2015, the Claimant put the Respondent in default of payment of the amount of EUR 200,000, setting a time limit expiring on 24 August 2015 in order to remedy the default. 4. On 21 July 2015, the Claimant lodged a claim against the Respondent in front of FIFA asking that the Respondent be ordered to pay overdue payables in the amount of EUR 200,000 corresponding to the last five instalments of the loan fee, which fell due on 1 April 2014, 1 July 2014, 1 October 2014, 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2015 respectively. 5. The Claimant further asks to be awarded unspecified interest as well as legal costs. 6. In spite of having been invited to do so, the Respondent did not reply to the claim. II. Considerations of the Single Judge of the Player’s Status Committee 1. First of all, the Single Judge of the Player’s Status Committee (hereinafter: the Single Judge) analysed whether he was competent to deal with the matter at hand. In this respect, he took note that the present matter was submitted to FIFA on 21 July 2015. Consequently, the Rules Governing the Procedures of the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber (edition 2015; hereinafter: Procedural Rules) are applicable to the matter at hand (cf. art. 21 of the Procedural Rules). 2. Subsequently, the Single Judge referred to art. 3 par. 2 and par. 3 of the Procedural Rules and confirmed that in accordance with art. 23 par. 1 and par. 3 in conjunction with art. 22 lit. f of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (edition 2015) he is competent to deal with the present matter, which concerns a dispute between two clubs affiliated to different associations. 3. Furthermore, the Single Judge analysed which regulations should be applicable as to the substance of the matter. In this respect, he confirmed that in accordance with art. 26 par. 1 and par. 2 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (edition 2015), and considering that the present claim was lodged on 21 July 2015, the 2015 edition of said regulations (hereinafter: Regulations) is applicable to the matter at hand as to the substance. 4. The competence of the Single Judge and the applicable regulations having been established, the Single Judge entered into the substance of the matter. In this respect, the Single Judge started by acknowledging all the above-mentioned facts as well as the arguments and the documentation on file. However, the Single Judge emphasised that in the following considerations he will refer only to the facts, arguments and documentary evidence, which he considered pertinent for the assessment of the matter at hand. 5. Having said this, the Single Judge acknowledged that the Claimant and the Respondent signed a loan agreement, in accordance with which the Claimant was entitled to receive from the Respondent, inter alia, the total amount of EUR 320,000, payable in eight equal instalments of EUR 40,000 on 15 July 2013, 1 October 2013, 1 January 2014, 1 April 2014, 1 July 2014, 1 October 2014, 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2015. 6. The Single Judge further acknowledged that the Claimant lodged a claim against the Respondent in front of FIFA, maintaining that the Respondent has overdue payables towards it in the total amount of EUR 200,000 corresponding to the instalments of the loan fee that fell due on 1 April 2014, 1 July 2014, 1 October 2014, 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2015. 7. In this context, the Single Judge took particular note of the fact that, on 14 August 2015, the Claimant put the Respondent in default of payment of the aforementioned amount, setting a time limit expiring on 24 August 2015 in order to remedy the default. 8. Consequently, the Single Judge concluded that the Claimant had duly proceeded in accordance with art. 12bis par. 3 of the Regulations, which stipulates that the creditor (player or club) must have put the debtor club in default in writing and have granted a deadline of at least ten days for the debtor club to comply with its financial obligations. 9. Subsequently, the Single Judge took into account that the Respondent, for its part, failed to present its response to the claim of the Claimant, in spite of having been invited to do so. In this way, the Single Judge considered that the Respondent renounced its right to defence and thus accepted the allegations of the Claimant. 10. Furthermore, as a consequence of the aforementioned consideration, the Single Judge concurred that in accordance with art. 9 par. 3 of the Procedural Rules he shall take a decision upon the basis of the documents already on file, in other words, upon the statements and documents presented by the Claimant. 11. Having said this, the Single Judge acknowledged that, in accordance with the loan agreement provided by the Claimant, the Respondent was obliged to pay to the Claimant the amount of EUR 320,000 payable in eight equal instalments of EUR 40,000 on 15 July 2013, 1 October 2013, 1 January 2014, 1 April 2014, 1 July 2014, 1 October 2014, 1 January 2015 and 1 April 2015. Furthermore, the Single Judge acknowledged that, as per the uncontested claim of the Claimant, the five last instalments remained unpaid by the Respondent. 12. Taking into account the documentation presented by the Claimant in support of its petition, the Single Judge concluded that the Claimant had substantiated its claim pertaining to overdue payables with sufficient documentary evidence. 13. On account of the aforementioned considerations, the Single Judge established that the Respondent failed to remit a total amount of EUR 200,000 payable to the Claimant. 14. In addition, the Single Judge established that the Respondent had delayed a due payment for more than 30 days without a prima facie contractual basis. 15. Consequently, the Single Judge decided that, in accordance with the general legal principle of pacta sunt servanda, the Respondent is liable to pay to the Claimant overdue payables in the total amount of EUR 200,000. 16. In addition, taking into account the Claimant’s request as well as the constant practice of the Players’ Status Committee, the Single Judge decided that the Respondent must pay to the Claimant interest of 5% p.a. over each of the instalments of the loan fee in the amount of EUR 40,000 as from the due dates until the date of effective payment. 17. Furthermore, as regards the claimed legal expenses, the Single Judge referred to art. 18 par. 4 of the Procedural Rules as well as to the long-standing and well-established jurisprudence of the Players’ Status Committee, in accordance with which no procedural compensation shall be awarded in proceedings in front of the Players’ Status Committee. Consequently, the Single Judge decided to reject the Claimant’s request relating to legal expenses. 18. In continuation, taking into account the consideration under number II./14. above, the Single Judge referred to art.12bis par. 2 of the Regulations which stipulates that any club found to have delayed a due payment for more than 30 days without a prima facie contractual basis may be sanctioned in accordance with art. 12bis par. 4 of the Regulations. 19. The Single Judge established that by virtue of art. 12bis par. 4 of the Regulations he has competence to impose sanctions on the Respondent. Bearing in mind that the Respondent did not reply to the claim of the Claimant, the Single Judge decided to impose a fine on the Respondent in accordance with art. 12bis par. 4 lit. c) of the Regulations. Furthermore, taking into consideration the amount due of EUR 200,000, the Single Judge regarded a fine amounting to CHF 15,000 as appropriate and hence decided to impose said fine on the Respondent. 20. In this connection, the Single Judge wished to highlight that a repeated offence will be considered as an aggravating circumstance and lead to more severe penalty in accordance with art. 12bis par. 6 of the Regulations. 21. Finally, the Single Judge referred to art. 25 par. 2 of the Regulations in combination with art. 18 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules, according to which in proceedings before the Players’ Status Committee including its Single Judge, costs in the maximum amount of CHF 25,000 are levied and which states that the costs are to be borne in consideration of the parties’ degree of success in the proceedings and are normally to be paid by the unsuccessful party. 22. Taking into account that the responsibility of the failure to comply with the payment of the amounts as agreed in the loan agreement can entirely be attributed to the Respondent and that the claim of the Claimant has been partially accepted, the Single Judge concluded that the Respondent has to bear the costs of the current proceedings before FIFA. According to Annexe A of the Procedural Rules, the costs of the proceedings are to be levied on the basis of the amount in dispute. On that basis, the Single Judge held that the amount to be taken into consideration in the present proceedings is EUR 200,000. Consequently, the Single Judge concluded that the maximum amount of costs of the proceedings corresponds to CHF 25,000. 23. Considering the particular circumstances of the present matter, bearing in mind that the Respondent did not reply to the claim of the Claimant, the Single Judge determined the costs of the current proceedings to the amount of CHF 25,000 and concluded that said amount has to be paid by the Respondent in order to cover the costs of the present proceedings. III. Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee 1. The claim of the Claimant, Club A, is partially accepted. 2. The Respondent, Club C, has to pay to the Claimant, within 30 days as from the date of notification of this decision, overdue payables in the amount of EUR 200,000, plus interest as follows, until the date of effective payment: - 5% p.a. as of 2 April 2014 on the amount of EUR 40,000, - 5% p.a. as of 2 July 2014 on the amount of EUR 40,000, - 5% p.a. as of 2 October 2014 on the amount of EUR 40,000, - 5% p.a. as of 2 January 2015 on the amount of EUR 40,000, and - 5% p.a. as of 2 April 2015 on the amount of EUR 40,000. 3. If the aforementioned amount plus interest is not paid within the aforementioned deadline, the present matter shall be submitted, upon request, to FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee, for consideration and a formal decision. 4. Any further claim of the Claimant is rejected. 5. The Respondent is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of CHF 15,000. The fine is to be paid within 30 days of notification of the present decision to FIFA to the following bank account: UBS Zurich Account number 366.677.01U (FIFA Players’ Status) Clearing number 230 IBAN: CH27 0023 0230 3666 7701U SWIFT: UBSWCHZH80A 6. The final amount of costs of the proceedings in the amount of CHF 25,000 is to be paid by the Respondent, within 30 days as from the notification of the present decision, as follows: a) The amount of CHF 5,000 to the Claimant. b) The amount of CHF 20,000 to FIFA to the above-mentioned bank account of FIFA (cf. point 5.). 7. The Claimant is directed to inform the Respondent immediately and directly of the account number to which the remittances under point 2. and 6.a) are to be made and to notify the Single Judge of every payment received. ***** Note relating to the motivated decision (legal remedy): According to article 67 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The statement of appeal must be sent to the CAS directly within 21 days of receipt of notification of this decision and shall contain all the elements in accordance with point 2 of the directives issued by the CAS, a copy of which we enclose hereto. Within another 10 days following the expiry of the time limit for filing the statement of appeal, the appellant shall file a brief stating the facts and legal arguments giving rise to the appeal with the CAS (cf. point 4 of the directives). The full address and contact numbers of the CAS are the following: Court of Arbitration for Sport Avenue de Beaumont 2 1012 Lausanne Switzerland Tel: +41 21 613 50 00 Fax: +41 21 613 50 01 e-mail: info@tas-cas.org www.tas-cas.org For the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee: Markus Kattner Acting Secretary General Encl: CAS directives