F.I.F.A. – Commissione per lo Status dei Calciatori (2015-2016) – debiti scaduti – ———- F.I.F.A. – Players’ Status Committee (2015-2016) – overdue payables – official version by www.fifa.com – Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee passed on 25 February 2016, by Mr Geoff Thompson (England) Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee, on the claim presented by the club, A, from S represented by Mrs xxxxx as Claimant against the club, B, from R as Respondent regarding a contractual dispute between the parties in connection with overdue payables I

F.I.F.A. - Commissione per lo Status dei Calciatori (2015-2016) – debiti scaduti – ---------- F.I.F.A. - Players’ Status Committee (2015-2016) – overdue payables – official version by www.fifa.com – Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee passed on 25 February 2016, by Mr Geoff Thompson (England) Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee, on the claim presented by the club, A, from S represented by Mrs xxxxx as Claimant against the club, B, from R as Respondent regarding a contractual dispute between the parties in connection with overdue payables I. Facts of the case 1. On 8 July 2014, the club from country S, A (hereinafter: Claimant), and the club from country R, B (hereinafter: Respondent) signed a transfer agreement regarding the transfer of the player, C (hereinafter: player) from the Claimant to the Respondent. 2. In accordance with the transfer agreement, the Respondent undertook to pay to the Claimant the total amount of EUR 1,800,000, payable as follows: EUR 1,250,000 “within 15 days of the signing of this Agreement and its communicate by fax to all parties” and EUR 550,000 “on or before 15 February 2015”. 3. As specified in the transfer agreement the Claimant “shall also be entitled to claim the interests arisen at a rate of 5% per annum (..) as of one month following the day that any unpaid instalment was due (..).” 4. By correspondence dated 21 December 2015, the Claimant put the Respondent in default of payment of the amount of EUR 450,093 setting a time limit expiring on 31 December 2015 in order to remedy the default. 5. On 12 January 2016, the Claimant lodged a claim against the Respondent with FIFA asking that the Respondent be ordered to pay overdue payables in the amount of EUR 450,093 corresponding to part of the second instalment due as per the transfer agreement. According to the Claimant, the Respondent had so far only paid EUR 99,907 out of EUR 550,000 that were originally due. 6. The Claimant further asked to be awarded interest of 5% p.a. as of 15 March 2015. 7. In spite of having been invited to do so, the Respondent did not reply to the claim. II. Considerations of the Single Judge of the Player’s Status Committee 1. First of all, the Single Judge of the Player’s Status Committee (hereinafter: the Single Judge) analysed whether he was competent to deal with the matter at hand. In this respect, he took note that the present matter was submitted to FIFA 12 January 2016. Consequently, the Rules Governing the Procedures of the Players’ Status Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber (edition 2015; hereinafter: Procedural Rules) are applicable to the matter at hand (cf. art. 21 of the Procedural Rules). 2. Subsequently, the Single Judge referred to art. 3 par. 2 and par. 3 of the Procedural Rules and confirmed that in accordance with art. 23 par. 1 and par. 3 in conjunction with art. 22 lit. f of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (edition 2015) he is competent to deal with the present matter, which concerns a dispute between two clubs affiliated to different associations. 3. Furthermore, the Single Judge analysed which regulations should be applicable as to the substance of the matter. In this respect, he confirmed that in accordance with art. 26 par. 1 and par. 2 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (edition 2015), and considering that the present claim was lodged on 16 January 2016, the 2015 edition of said regulations (hereinafter: Regulations) is applicable to the matter at hand as to the substance. 4. His competence and the applicable regulations having been established, the Single Judge entered into the substance of the matter. In this respect, the Single Judge started by acknowledging all the above-mentioned facts as well as the arguments and the documentation on file. However, the Single Judge emphasised that in the following considerations he will refer only to the facts, arguments and documentary evidence, which he considered pertinent for the assessment of the matter at hand. 5. Having said this, the Single Judge acknowledged that the Claimant and the Respondent signed a transfer agreement, in accordance with which the Claimant was entitled to receive from the Respondent, inter alia, the total amount of EUR 1,800,000, payable on in two instalments of EUR 1,250,000 and EUR 550,000 respectively. The second instalment in the amount of EUR 550,000 was to be paid to the Claimant by no later than 15 February 2015. 6. The Single Judge further acknowledged that the Claimant lodged a claim against the Respondent with FIFA, maintaining that the Respondent has overdue payables towards it in the total amount of EUR 450,093, corresponding to part of the second instalment due as per the transfer agreement. 7. In this context, the Single Judge took particular note of the fact that, on 21 December 2015, the Claimant put the Respondent in default of payment of the aforementioned amount, setting a time limit expiring on 31 December 2015 in order to remedy the default. 8. Consequently, the Single Judge concluded that the Claimant had duly proceeded in accordance with art. 12bis par. 3 of the Regulations, which stipulates that the creditor (player or club) must have put the debtor club in default in writing and have granted a deadline of at least ten days for the debtor club to comply with its financial obligations. 9. Subsequently, the Single Judge took into account that the Respondent, for its part, failed to present its response to the claim of the Claimant, in spite of having been invited to do so. In this way, the Single Judge considered that the Respondent renounced its right to defence and thus accepted the allegations of the Claimant. 10. Furthermore, as a consequence of the aforementioned consideration, the Single Judge concurred that in accordance with art. 9 par. 3 of the Procedural Rules he shall take a decision upon the basis of the documents already on file, in other words, upon the statements and documents presented by the Claimant. 11. Having said this, the Single Judge acknowledged that, in accordance with the transfer agreement, the Respondent was obliged to pay to the Claimant the total amount of EUR 1,800,000 in two instalments of EUR 1,250,000 and EUR 550,000 respectively, whereas the second instalment was due to be paid by 15 February 2015. 12. Taking into account the documentation presented by the Claimant in support of its petition, the Single Judge concluded that the Claimant had substantiated its claim pertaining to overdue payables with sufficient documentary evidence. 13. On account of the aforementioned considerations, the Single Judge established that the Respondent failed to remit total amount of EUR 450,093 payable to the Claimant. 14. In addition, the Single Judge established that the Respondent had delayed a due payment for more than 30 days without a prima facie contractual basis. 15. Consequently, the Single Judge decided that, in accordance with the general legal principle of pacta sunt servanda, the Respondent is liable to pay to the Claimant overdue payables in the total amount of EUR 450,093. 16. In addition, taking into account the Claimant’s request as well as the content of the transfer agreement in this respect, the Single Judge decided that the Respondent must pay to the Claimant interest of 5% p.a. on the amount of EUR 450,093 as from 16 March 2015 until the date of effective payment. 17. In continuation, taking into account the consideration under number II./14. above, the Single Judge referred to art.12bis par. 2 of the Regulations which stipulates that any club found to have delayed a due payment for more than 30 days without a prima facie contractual basis may be sanctioned in accordance with art. 12bis par. 4 of the Regulations. 18. The Single Judge established that by virtue of art. 12bis par. 4 of the Regulations he has competence to impose sanctions on the Respondent. Bearing in mind that the Respondent did not reply to the claim of the Claimant, the Single Judge decided to impose a fine on the Respondent in accordance with art. 12bis par. 4 lit. c) of the Regulations. Furthermore, taking into consideration the amount due of EUR 450,093, the Single Judge regarded a fine amounting to CHF 20,000 as appropriate and hence decided to impose said fine on the Respondent. 19. In this connection, the Single Judge wished to highlight that a repeated offence will be considered as an aggravating circumstance and lead to more severe penalty in accordance with art. 12bis par. 6 of the Regulations. 20. Finally, the Single Judge referred to art. 25 par. 2 of the Regulations in combination with art. 18 par. 1 of the Procedural Rules, according to which in proceedings before the Players’ Status Committee including its Single Judge, costs in the maximum amount of CHF 25,000 are levied and which states that the costs are to be borne in consideration of the parties’ degree of success in the proceedings and are normally to be paid by the unsuccessful party. 21. Taking into account that the responsibility of the failure to comply with the payment of the amounts as agreed in the transfer agreement can entirely be attributed to the Respondent and that the claim of the Claimant has been fully accepted, the Single Judge concluded that the Respondent has to bear the costs of the current proceedings before FIFA. According to Annexe A of the Procedural Rules, the costs of the proceedings are to be levied on the basis of the amount in dispute. On that basis, the Single Judge held that the amount to be taken into consideration in the present proceedings is EUR 450,093. Consequently, the Single Judge concluded that the maximum amount of costs of the proceedings corresponds to CHF 25,000. 22. Considering the particular circumstances of the present matter, bearing in mind that the Respondent did not reply to the claim of the Claimant, the Single Judge determined the costs of the current proceedings to the amount of CHF 25,000 and concluded that said amount has to be paid by the Respondent in order to cover the costs of the present proceedings. III. Decision of the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee 1. The claim of the Claimant, A, is partially accepted. 2. The Respondent, B, has to pay to the Claimant, within 30 days as from the date of notification of this decision, overdue payables in the amount of EUR 450,093, plus interest at the rate of 5% p.a. as from 16 March 2015 until the date of effective payment. 3. If the aforementioned amount plus interest is not paid within the aforementioned deadline, the present matter shall be submitted, upon request, to FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee, for consideration and a formal decision. 4. The Respondent is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of CHF 20,000. The fine is to be paid within 30 days of notification of the present decision to FIFA to the following bank account with reference to case nr.: UBS Zurich Account number 366.677.01U (FIFA Players’ Status) Clearing number 230 IBAN: CH27 0023 0230 3666 7701U SWIFT: UBSWCHZH80A 5. The final amount of costs of the proceedings in the amount of CHF 25,000 is to be paid by the Respondent, within 30 days as from the notification of the present decision, as follows: a) The amount of CHF 5,000 has to be paid to the Claimant. b) The amount of CHF 20,000 has to be paid to FIFA to above-mentioned bank account of FIFA (cf. point 4.) with reference to case no 6. The Claimant is directed to inform the Respondent immediately and directly of the account number to which the remittances under point 2. and 5.a) are to be made and to notify the Single Judge of every payment received. ***** Note relating to the motivated decision (legal remedy): According to article 67 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, this decision may be appealed against before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The statement of appeal must be sent to the CAS directly within 21 days of receipt of notification of this decision and shall contain all the elements in accordance with point 2 of the directives issued by the CAS, a copy of which we enclose hereto. Within another 10 days following the expiry of the time limit for filing the statement of appeal, the appellant shall file a brief stating the facts and legal arguments giving rise to the appeal with the CAS (cf. point 4 of the directives). The full address and contact numbers of the CAS are the following: Court of Arbitration for Sport Avenue de Beaumont 2 1012 Lausanne Switzerland Tel: +41 21 613 50 00 Fax: +41 21 613 50 01 e-mail: info@tas-cas.org www.tas-cas.org For the Single Judge of the Players’ Status Committee: Player C (Club A, country S / Club B, country R) Page 7 of 7 Markus Kattner Acting Secretary General Encl: CAS directives